Thursday, August 23, 2007
Predictions, Discussions, and Reports for games played between Aug 24 and Aug 31
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Reports and discussions of matches played weekend of August 18th
played this weekend
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at midwestcricket.org
Friday, August 17, 2007
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Discussion for games played weekend of August 18th
weekend of August 18th
Friday, August 10, 2007
Discussion for games played weekend of August 11th
played on the weekend of August 11th
--------
Friday, August 03, 2007
The Race For Number One
Season Champion of Division Two will automatically advance
to Division One at the end of the season (to be joined by
the winner of the playoffs). Given that, the Race for Number
One has assumed immense proportions this regular season.
At the moment, it is neck-and-neck - no less than 4 teams
are tied at 32 points with an 8-1 record! They are Peoria,
Advancers, IIT and QC Kings. The following are their
remaining schedules:
Peoria CC: IIT, Illinois, Warriors, Tigers, Universal
(all games in Mossville)
Advancers: Universal, Collinsville (away), IIT, Arsenal, CCI (away)
IIT: Peoria (away), Lucky, Advancers, Warriors, NoStars
QC Kings: SIUE (away), Arsenal, Raiders, Giants, Collinsville
(last 4 in Moline)
The big game is this weekend, with IIT visiting fellow-Big-Four
team Peoria. After that Peoria takes on the dangerous Illinois.
Advancers have their biggest test playing fellow Big Four IIT
in 3 weeks, and then the dangerous Arsenal. IIT, obviously,
has yet to play both Big Four teams (Peoria and Advancers).
QC Kings seem to be the ones with the easiest schedule, not
playing any of their Big Four brethren - but they do play
four dangerous sides in SIUE, Arsenal, Raiders and Giants,
three of them at home. (Overall, too, it must be said that
the QC Kings probably ended up with the easiest schedule
in retrospect - they will end the regular season without
having played any of Peoria, IIT or the Advancers. Everyone
else has played one of the 4, with IIT having played 2 of
the 4).
Who will emerge from this Race for Number One? Predictions,
analysis etc - especially from teams who have played more
than one of the Big Four this year - would be great to
read! And over the weekends, rapid updates on the games of
any of the Big Four would be greatly appreciated as well...
Written by Sadiq Yusuf
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at midwestcricket.org
Discussion for games played during weekend of August 5th
played during the weekend of August 5th.
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at midwestcricket.org
Friday, July 27, 2007
Discussion for games between July 28th and Aug 3rd
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Incident on July 23rd-Mon
I was standing right next to him as they engaged in this wonderful bit of showmanship and was really ashamed. What could I possibly tell an officer who gets abused by our own cricketing fraternity? The patrol officer was planning to talk to the park district management and revoke our license to play at Hanover Park. At the end of the day, we were able to convince him that these were the actions of a select few.
I am quite sure that none of our players would have done something so irresponsible. I strongly urge each and every player to ensure that the guests they bring also behave responsibly. Driving away and honking at the patrol officer is definitely not funny and does not reflect well.
It takes a long time to build a relationship with a park district. Hanover Park district officials have been very supportive of cricket and our league. It is upto each and everyone of us to ensure that this is a long lasting relationship.
Hope this is a one time incident.
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Discussion for games between July 21st and 27th
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Friday, July 13, 2007
Discussion for games played in the LA Open
a wafer-thin margin in their first game in the LA Open.
MWCC batted first, and scored 143 in their 20 overs. The
top rungetters were Amit and Madhu with 43 and 30 respectively.
Both Sohail and Satha hit a couple fours early each before
being dismissed.
In reply Ventura XI got home thanks to their WI-international
Leon Garrick, who carried them to victory with 4 wickets and
3 balls to spare. MWCC apparently felt they had Garrick out
early (caught-and-bowled by Amit), but much to their chagrin
it was ruled a bump-ball. Asif apparentely bowled beautifully,
conceding only 1 boundary in his 4 overs and picking up a
wicket as well. A couple more chances were given to Garrick
(it was supposedly fielding that was one of the biggest reasons
for MWCC's loss), and it finally came down to 18 needed off
the last 2 overs. It was eventually about 11 needed in 7
balls, when Nasir (bowling the penultimate over) beat
everyone, batsman and keeper, off the last ball of his over
that went for 4 byes! It was thus down to 7 off the last over,
and Ventura XI made it with 3 balls to spare.
More updates (from anyone who gets them) and updates to follow
in the discussion-section of this thread.
Written by Sadiq Yusuf
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at midwestcricket.org
Friday, July 06, 2007
Discussion for games played during weekend of July 7th
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at midwestcricket.org
Key amendments to MCC Rules and Regulations w.e.f. 07/02/2007
- 30/30 Division - Limit on players who are registered in Div 1 and Div 2 (Currently Clause 8…8.6)
- 30/30 division teams shall be permitted to add to their roster players who are also registered to play in Division 1 or Division 2, subject to the following conditions;
- At any given time, the number of such players (registered with other teams) shall not exceed 5
- Of the 5 registered players, no more than 3 players shall be permitted to play in any game
- Players once registered cannot be changed or transferred at any cost
- Walk-over Rules (Currently Clause 16.1 – Points table)
- Teams awarding walk-over for any reason whatsoever shall be penalized 4 points. In order to get the full points, Teams receiving walk-overs in matches should make sure that a minimum of 7 players are present at the ground when the decision is made by the umpire about the walk-over. The umpire is required to make sure that the players (at least 7) are already registered players of that team. No exceptions or assumptions shall be made.
| Win | 4 (Four) Points |
| Walk-over Received | 4 (Four) Points (to the team receiving the walkover) subject to umpire’s report |
| Tie | 3 (Three) Points to each team |
| Loss | 0 (Zero) Points |
| Walk Over Given | - 4 (Negative Four) Points (to the team failing to show up) for any reason whatsoever |
- Playoff Qualifications Rule (Currently clause 8.9)
- Players who have not played a minimum of 3 games in the regular season are not qualified to play in the playoffs, unless;
- In the opinion of the MCC committee, the player was injured during most part of the season and such medical or illness has been properly supported by documentation and approved by the committee.
- If not for the match or matches that were rained, the player would have completed the required number of games to qualify for playoffs. In such rained out matches the following shall be taken care of;
- It shall be the responsibility of the captains to handover the list of players for the match to the umpire before the play is called off.
- The player should be one who is already registered in the website and he should be physically present on the ground at the time the match is called off
- The umpire shall make sure that the players are registered and fax his report promptly to the committee clearly stating the players who were physically present at the ground.
- Mandatory umpiring
- It shall be mandatory on all teams to contribute to the league umpiring and the following conditions shall apply,
- Each team shall provide volunteers (both main umpire and leg umpire) for 2 matches.
- The main umpire and the leg umpire shall officiate for the same match and will go together as a team
- Of the 2 matches, one shall be a local game and the other an outstation game
- No payment shall be made to the umpires for these two matches.
- Lunch shall be provided by the host team
- For outstation games, the umpires shall be provided transportation by the visiting team
- TEAMS CAN CHOOSE A DATE OF THEIR CHOICE, FAILING WHICH THE LEAGUE SHALL ASSIGN THE DATES FOR EACH TEAM. DATES ONCE ASSIGNED SHALL BE FINAL AND TEAMS FAILING TO ASSIGN UMPIRES ON THAT DAY WILL BE CHARGED $200 FOR EACH VIOLATION.
- The mandatory two match quota shall be completed before the penultimate game of the season
- Mandatory Umpire Certification
- The league shall takes steps in a staggered manner to make sure that only certified umpires are assigned for all matches. Accordingly,
- All umpires will be required to undergo certification in order to be able to officiate in the league
- It shall be mandatory on all teams to make sure that at least one member of the team is certified in umpiring by MCC by the start of the next season.
- It shall be mandatory on all teams to make sure that at least two members of the team are certified in umpiring by MCC by the end of the next season.
- Advancing to Division I for next season (Currently Clause 27)
- Regardless of number of teams in the conference the winner of Division II Finals and the Top Seed from Division II Regular Season standings shall move to Division I. However, if the winner of Division II and the Top seed from Division II regular season are the same, then the Winner and the Runner-up of Division II shall move up to Division I.