Thursday, July 05, 2007

Go West, Young Men!

The MCC team to the LA Open has been announced. It is
as follows (taken from the LA Open link on the main
page):

Player Name Team Name
Sohail Alvi - Captain St. Louis RH Batsman
Shahid Munir - VC Pak Gym RH Bat/Bowl
Satha Sivapragasam Capitol RH Batsman
Maninder Bola Peoria RH Bat/LA Bowl
Afroze Siddiqui Bears RH Spin/Bat
Amit Kumar St. Louis RH Spin/Bat
Asif Mahmood Milwaukee LA Spin/RH Bat
Raheel Akhter Pak Gym RH Fast Bowler
Imran Taylor Lucky XI Wkt Keeper
Nilesh Patel Challengers RH Bat/Bowl
Nasir Mehmood Flames RH Fast Bowler
Madhu Reddy Peoria RH Bat/Bowl
Dakshesh Patel Challengers RH Bat/Bowl

Following players were contacted but are not avaibale due to their personal engagements.


Player Name Team Name
Satish Reddy Wildcats
Bhavneet Sarna Milwaukee United
Kiran Kambhampati Flames
Ajay Ghandi IIT
Wade Allen Milwaukee
Ajit Ramaswami Wildcats
Tehsin Ahmed St. Louis
------------

A quite similar team to last year, and one (similarly)
that could have been even better if some of the players
contacted had been available to actually go.

Views and Comments? Brickbats and bouquets? Feel free to
write in, to our new LA Open thread (as if our blog ever
needed that invitation :-) And meanwhile, Good Luck to
Our Boys in their adventure out West - may you do us
proud!


by Sadiq Yusuf

sadiq@midwestcricket.org

222 comments:

  1. Sadiq,

    Nice Article. Thanks for getting this thread started, as I'm sure there will be a lot of comments on it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Imran's exclusion is a disappointment for sure. And everyone will at some point question the makeup and procedures of the selection committee! But how would you change it? Should it be the President and Vice-President making the selections? Should there be others? How many? Is there a better system / suggestion someone would like to throw out than the current practice of the MWCC?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tango.. I agree that Imran Syed should have been on the plane to LA.

    I like the idea of having a bunch of selectors(not from management) and let them select the team.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who will create the selection commitee?
    I personally believe in performance rather than reputation. Top 15 is one tool that should be used to pick the team.

    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  5. how about a teak like this?

    Sohail Alvi -
    Shahid Munir -
    Satha Sivapragasam
    Maninder Bola
    Afroze Siddiqui - replaced with pradeep
    Amit Kumar - replaced with imran syed
    Asif Mahmood
    Raheel Akhter - replaced with jack
    Imran Taylor - replaced with suresh
    Nilesh Patel
    Nasir Mehmood - replaced with sanjay
    Madhu Reddy
    Dakshesh Patel

    ReplyDelete
  6. ideal situation addi would have spoke to TA and asked for list of players considered. he would know TA doesnt have the smartness to pick Imran. addi would have picked up imran and imran would score heavily in la. very sad to see imran lose oportunity :(((((

    =============================
    Mehul did contact Tariq and asked for the list. Never got a reply. It's a catch 22. If I had tried to approach him beofre MWCC, I would have been labeled as someone who is trying to undermine the efforts. I am still trying to get him. We will know for sure by Saturday when we play against Muslim Gym.

    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  7. Who would you replace on the list and with whom? Remember, they fill specific roles, so be careful.

    Here's who I'd replace

    Sanjay Patel - Raheel
    Priyank - Nasir
    Pradeep - Afroze
    Imran Syed - Amit
    Mahesh - Imran Taylor

    Jack's been in bad form this year, so I'd still take Madhu ahead of him. But he's a baller none the less.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jaggi said,
    Tango.. I agree that Imran Syed should have been on the plane to LA.

    I like the idea of having a bunch of selectors(not from management) and let them select the team.
    ---------------------------------
    Not in your dreams Jaggi, unless we change management.
    The contacted Teshin and you all call Rup Old.
    Any day he is still better than most of the pace bowlers on this LA squad. and we all know he can bat. poor Jack, he needs to do a M/Jackson makeover and maybe then MWCC will select him.
    Or a Racist suite against this mgt may change they way we look at players.

    Tariq needs to stay in PA permanently as when the finacials do come out he will go to jail. Sohail, be carefull or you will be his cell mate. I don't know why Humayun is risking his career with these guys.
    We will never see changes if Either this Mgt or Addi wins.
    Rup has proposed running for president with very good ideas but you all will never vote him in cause he is still a Banda in your eyes. That is why I feel he will end up not running.
    I feel Sorry for Rup and ICC for MWCC will never let them win anything or represent MWCC. Umpires took them out of the finals last year and is killing them again this year. 3 LBW's last week all questionable.
    Rup you guys need to come out of the sportsman/good guys attitude and do a Farhat on these umpires.

    ReplyDelete
  9. the selection committee will be chosen by the management. There are individuals who are very knowledgeable about the game and our league and will pick people based on merit.

    Although numbers are important, I dont think it gives the entire picture. Numbers alone would get someone like Madhu in the team ( he is now coming down the order and hence not on the top 15).

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Good will prevali"...well said. Good is something of the past and the truth is always brushed away,but reality never leaves....my broda.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jaggi, (and everyone else)

    Your suggestion is a good one. Have a bunch of selectors not in management so as to try and take the politics out of the equation (if there is any).

    However, a couple of further questions. How many selectors? Who picks the selectors? Are there any restrictions on selectors? What is a selector should, or is in contention for a spot to the MWCC team? Should be there be some form of tryouts? Maybe use the Night tournament as a selection tool? What about using other tools such as reputation (career numbers), potential, current form (season numbers), etc?

    I want to get some detailed ideas from everyone, because if we want a change, we must have an alternate solution in mind that people can subscribe to. After that, we can only hope that the Mgmt team, whoever that may be, is receptive to these new ideas! But step 1 first.....

    ReplyDelete
  12. What is a selector should => What if a selector should

    ReplyDelete
  13. Should be there be => Should there be

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well said Dr. Booo...reality will never leave and you should teach your mates how to be unsportsman like B(r)oood(hhh)a :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. the selection committee will be chosen by the management.
    ---------------------------
    ...Then might as well not have a selection commitee.
    I was looking for something like 'Selection Committee will be chosen by the board of directors, who are elected by the team members for two years.'


    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Selectors or the committee should be selected by Team caps and Elite Umpiring panel. A group independent of the management.

    They should meet right after the AGM, dont have to physically be present.
    They can use Technology and do a web meeting, goto meeting something like that.

    But I think the Team caps can form a selection comittee that will be responsible for selecting teams for regionals, LA Open or any tourney...

    my $0.02

    ReplyDelete
  17. Isn't Rup of Indian origin? So the question of race can be thrown out of the window. Racism is not the right word, maybe xenophobia.

    Either way, I don't think race or someones origin has anything to do with selection, its more about favoritism shown by management to their own teammates and chamcha's. (stooges)

    With regards to the elections, if Indian teams can vote for a Pakistani President, and vice-versa, then I'm sure they won't mind voting for a West Indian President either.

    ReplyDelete
  18. But I think the Team caps can form a selection comittee that will be responsible for selecting teams for regionals, LA Open or any tourney...
    ============================
    This could lead to favorable treatment for some. Everyone will be fighting to get thier 'Banda' in.


    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  19. You mean fav. treatment from the selection committee?

    I dont think so..if we can form a balanced committee, I dont think we'll have a bias issue..

    I said that the teams caps along with others can form the committee not select the team..

    I'm signing out right now..so will be back for the discussions later..

    peace out.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sorry! the wording was such that I though you wanted the team caps to be the selectors. Let me pull a Bush on you 'My Bad.'

    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  21. guys,

    we are just wasting time here. its not like TA going to change anything. also we know TA doesnt pick up the team, sohail does. we should get rid of him first.

    anyone want to move no confidence motion against sohail?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Adnan,

    Your point of selecting the committee that selects the team is fair. Shekh's suggestion (vote for the selection committee members) probably is on the lines you were thinking. Problem I see is that it bring back politics into it!

    What about non-playing Umpires and other impartial folk to form the selection committee? What about using the Night tourney and "try-outs" to pick a squad of 24 (2 teams of 12), and then fine tune it to a squad of 14 or 15 or whatever?

    I'll check in later to see what people think. I'm out too!

    ReplyDelete
  23. NW, Tango's definitely got you for competition for MVB this year!

    ReplyDelete
  24. -----------
    Tango said...
    Imran Syed - Amit
    ------

    This is the second or third time Ive seen the suggestion that Amit is a bad pick... and I must disagree.

    First of all, let me agree about Imran - I would have definitely had him in my side to LA, one of the first people there IMHO. In the end he was the highest rungetter in the entire league last season, and he is a clean and big hitter of the ball, probably, as Jaggi says, one of the cleanest hitters in our league (ie he is suited to 20/20, its not like he makes his runs batting very slowly or something). I will confess to being very very surprised he isnt there, I was very sure he was going to be.

    But it isnt an either/or with him and Amit IMHO. Amit came to our league only last year, and didnt play all the games (and so didnt make the Top Fifteen in runs I think). I cant at the moment access the stats for some reason (is the website down?)... but I do seem to recall Amit playing about 9 games last year, and ending up 2nd or 3rd in the batting averages for the season. He had a *very* good year last year. This season he has continued that - he *is* in the Top Fifteen in runs currently I believe (again, cant access the stats). He got a 60+ against Challengers, and another 60-odd this week against United IIRC. In his short time in our league, he has clearly put up the numbers to be considered strongly for this team. And he is a pretty young guy, runs well, bowls a little bit etc too. He hasnt played the Abid Laheri tournament because he is in St Louis - he shouldnt be penalized for that by not being picked, however. Nor can you penalize him for just playing on home pitches - if that was the case, youd have to penalize all away teams and players, which isnt fair to anyone (Satha has made all his runs at home, Asif has taken all his wickets at home - they are still 2 of the best players we have however, and obvious picks for the side).

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  25. When did I say Amit is a bad pick? I just said that there are more deserving batsman than Amit. I said, Nasir, Raheel and Imran are BAD PICKS, the rest are acceptable. Don't read between the lines Sadiq.

    And Amit's average, like Satha's average, is inflated, since they both play on batting friendly surfaces.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I disagree with Sadiq. Amit is an excellent 50 over batsman, but not suitable for 20/20 game. He is the type of batsman who likes to settle down before playing big shots. Imran can act from the word 'Go'.


    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  27. ---------
    Rup has proposed running for president with very good ideas but you all will never vote him in cause he is still a Banda in your eyes. That is why I feel he will end up not running.
    I feel Sorry for Rup and ICC for MWCC will never let them win anything or represent MWCC. Umpires took them out of the finals last year and is killing them again this year. 3 LBW's last week all questionable.
    Rup you guys need to come out of the sportsman/good guys attitude and do a Farhat on these umpires.
    -------

    Hey, one can disagree with ideas without being racist :-) I think Rup did have some good ideas that I agree with, but he also had other ideas that I personally disagree with completely. But then we have different opinions - Iam a bit old-fashioned in that sense, I *like* white clothes, red ball, I think thats real cricket and dont want to go to colored clothes for regular season as he does, for example. I dont want shorter games or a shorter season - I want 45 overs for Div1, and maybe even 15-16 games if thats what it takes to play everyone in your division (I dont like the idea of not playing anyone in your own division). These are just differences of opinion, really, no more than that.

    And I'll disagree with your statement about umpiring too :-) Sridhar umpired the AAA-ICC game last year - he is one of the organizers of umpiring, he does the training of umpires. He is hardly biased one way or the other IMHO. Maybe he made a mistake, I dont even know if he did - but he was surely not biased in any way. You cant really blame umpires for losses IMHO - I dont know about last week for example, I wasnt there and dont remember who was umpiring, but the opposition did put up 250 in 40 overs, no? Those things arent the umpires fault. Anyone may have made mistakes, but one shouldnt allege racism or a conspiracy against a team for that reason, thats not very fair. ICC is a very good team and a fun team, but theyre not playing great this year so far - and having too much fun may have something to do with it :-) (I umpired you guys only once this year, in Madison... and surely the fact that everyone was partying a lot of the previous night had *something* to do with the fact that you guys were 75 allout, no? I dont know if you did that sort of thing last year as much! But thats ICC for you - having fun has always been very important to the team, and thats a very good thing IMHO).

    And as for doing a Farhat... I like Rup and admire his cricket, but please dont, at least not when Iam umpiring :-)


    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  28. cricketwallah,

    why dont you put forward your hypothetical team given that some of the peoele are not avail.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Adnan said...
    I disagree with Sadiq. Amit is an excellent 50 over batsman, but not suitable for 20/20 game. He is the type of batsman who likes to settle down before playing big shots. Imran can act from the word 'Go'.

    ----------

    addy, i must disagree with you for once. :)) and also i'm not speaking for amit either. but lets take his case. how do you know his style doesnt suit 20/20. you have seen him in 45 over format and i'm sure he is batting accordingly.

    why on the earth anyone should hit everyball from ball one in 45 over game?

    ReplyDelete
  30. --------
    And Amit's average, like Satha's average, is inflated, since they both play on batting friendly surfaces.
    --------

    See, Satha plays on basically a tarred-road-type surface covered with matting. It is really not very different from Washington Park at all, only marginally if anything - maybe a bit more even, fewer bad bounces, but similar-style pace and bounce. And that surface is, IMHO, far *less* friendly for batting than a place like Hanover Park (where many Chicago players get to play much more than Satha does). To say his record is inflated is thus IMHO very unfair.

    What Satha does play on is a ground where the outfield this year is lightning fast. But that is this year - its not *always* the case! (Last time I went to Springfield was 2 years ago, and the outfield that year was not particularly fast at all - it has a lot to do with amount of rainfall early in summer etc obviously). And, really, WP has a lightning fast outfield this year too (the Phoenix/United game 2 weeks ago was played on one of hte fastest outfields Ive seen at WP - it hadnt rained in a while when that game was played).

    BTW, if we're talking surfaces being friendly and unfriendly... how many times has 200 been scored in Lincoln Park in Milwaukee this season? Or last season? Over 2 seasons, maybe like 2-3 times? Now *thats* a surface that can be considered very difficult for batsmen and generally low-scoring, right? And Romesh Kadlec has played all his games on it this year, and is currently #2 in runs in our league despite that? Yet the only person who even thought he should be a contender for the past month was me, I think :-)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  31. ==============================
    What about non-playing Umpires and other impartial folk to form the selection committee? What about using the Night tourney and "try-outs" to pick a squad of 24 (2 teams of 12), and then fine tune it to a squad of 14 or 15 or whatever?
    =============================
    This becomes a process handled by the Board of directors. This is where the problem is. We must have a structure that distributes power. Right now the way it is setup you can't even take a leak without getting an OK from 'Bada Saheb'. We eliminate centralized power, the rest will follow. The way I look at it, it is our league, we are the patrons and we should have a say so. If majority wants to play with a $20 Kookabura, management should not be dictating their terms. I am sure if you talk to the management they will tell you that there is a selection comittee in place, but again who has the final say in approving these players?



    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  32. ================================
    addy, i must disagree with you for once. :)) and also i'm not speaking for amit either. but lets take his case. how do you know his style doesnt suit 20/20. you have seen him in 45 over format and i'm sure he is batting accordingly.
    ==================================
    Played enough Cricket to take a look at the batsman and come to a conclusion. Once you get to my age and played as much Cricket as I have, you be the same. I am not saying I am right, just telling you what I think.

    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  33. i like that addy. we are coming into terms now. who knows i might be your PR coordinator for next year election

    ReplyDelete
  34. Addi said,
    This becomes a process handled by the Board of directors. This is where the problem is. We must have a structure that distributes power. Right now the way it is setup you can't even take a leak without getting an OK from 'Bada Saheb'.
    --------------------------
    You took a leak, infact sevral leaks without permission and every time you pretty much pissed on MWCC players.
    You had a chance with the LA open to show you care about MWCC but you picked a team from Pengiun land and your buddys.
    Are you any better that this current bunch of pricks.
    "DON'T EVEN USE THE BALONEY PHRASE AGAIN OF WAITING TO SEE WHAT mwcc WILL DO CAUSE YOU NEVER INTENDED TO????"

    ReplyDelete
  35. BTW, nobody has really mentioned it so far... but the biggest problem I forsee for this squad in LA is the lack of spinners. The last year or two, it was spinners who played the biggest role in LA - they were the most effective bowlers on every team given the surfaces provided. Even international level pacemen went for runs sometimes, more than the spinners did. Our own most economical bowler of the tournament by a mile, IIRC, was Subba Vadlamani of St Louis.

    In this team, there is really only Asif who is a full-time spinner, and maybe Amit and Afroze and Maninder who do it part-time. It is probably not a coincidence that both Bhavneet and Tehsin were asked, given the need for spinners on these surfaces - even 3 or 4 may not have been excessive in the squad.

    This is also, however, probably a weak-spot in our league - which quality spinners would one pick for the squad, apart from Asif? I probably rate Samarth high amongst the rest, but he is already in the United squad (Tehsin and Bhavneet are already unavailable). Who else could have been good enough to bowl spin at the very high level we'll see in LA? Narpreet, Shiv etc are good, but are all older with some fielding liabilities. I have a lot of time for Khadry of Advancers, but his numbers in Division Two havent been very strong the last couple of years - at least not enough to make him an obvious pick. Can anyone think of any true standouts who could have been picked in this department?

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  36. NW preapre a candidate for '08.

    Good_will_prevail, you are late in Adnan Bashing game. It is already established that I am the bad guy.



    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  37. ...therefore I have the Carte Blanche to piss people off and do what I feel is right.



    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  38. simran from purdue is good

    ReplyDelete
  39. Addi said
    Good_will_prevail, you are late in Adnan Bashing game. It is already established that I am the bad guy.
    ..........................
    Not bad guy just another prik With a Cap P!!!
    You have f****ed up so bad this time you want to start getting on the players good side.
    All in favor of bycotting UCC.. don't play against them if schedule raise your hands. He can then take UCC to the promised land of ACC.

    ReplyDelete
  40. --------
    Can anyone think of any true standouts who could have been picked in this department?
    ------

    Oh, and forgot to mention the other names/contenders... maybe Saad of Muslim, Pradeep from Purdue, Sanjay from Wildcats, perhaps even Laxmi from IIT etc. And of course Bhavesh, Bakshi etc (who havent been considered by the selectors presumably for other reasons). But nobody really obvious jumps to my mind as someone who is clearly head-and-shoulders above the rest like Asif. Anyone think of someone obvious being missed?

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  41. ---------
    neanderthal_walking said...
    simran from purdue is good
    -------

    Yes, I agree, Simran from Purdue is very good... and probably the type of guy who we should consider for LA, young, fit, fields very well, bats very well if somewhat steadily (a century and couple fifties in limited games last year IIRC), very controlled spin bowler etc. However, Simran is not playing in our league now - he hasnt played a single game for Purdue this year, is off in India for summer I hear (he is like an undergrad or something), and is probably unlikely to join Purdue all season from what I was told. Else he would have been a very good choice, I agree.

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  42. All in favor of bycotting UCC.. don't play against them if schedule raise your hands. He can then take UCC to the promised land of ACC.
    ===========================
    Goodwill, why don't you be the first one and tell us your team name, so we can request not to schedule a game against you? Also if you are just a member of a club then you have no weight as team Captains are only authorized to vote in the AGM.


    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  43. Sanjay, from the cats, is a good spinner.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I heard that there is a one very good right arm leg spinner from Cedar Rapids who play Iowa league. If it doesn't hurt may be when planning for big events like this try to pull in as much talent possible from other leagues within midwest. My 2 cents.

    http://cl-ia.hitscricket.com/memberprofile/memberID_9479/Senthil_Selvamani.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  45. c8w,
    Iam a bit old-fashioned in that sense, I *like* white clothes, red ball, I think thats real cricket and dont want to go to colored clothes for regular season as he does, for example.
    -------------------
    that your problem too old fashioned.
    ------------------------
    Sridhar umpired the AAA-ICC game last year - he is one of the organizers of umpiring, he does the training of umpires.
    ---------------------------
    So he auto qualifies for the diamond plaque..If true what will you give the current mgt, the are our organizers and look how pleased we are??
    --------------------------
    "But thats ICC for you - having fun has always been very important to the team,.
    -----------------
    This part i like and it will never change because I feel ICC will never be given a fair oppurtunity to win. All I get is apologies after someone just screwed us over.
    So we might as well just party and have fun.
    If you like whenever we meet I can go over all the time ICC has been knocked out because of umpires had a say!!!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Addi,
    It's because of people like you that causing USA cricket to look like S***T.
    Self promoting nut case you are!!!

    ReplyDelete
  47. BTW, if we're talking surfaces being friendly and unfriendly... how many times has 200 been scored in Lincoln Park in Milwaukee this season? Or last season? Over 2 seasons, maybe like 2-3 times? Now *thats* a surface that can be considered very difficult for batsmen and generally low-scoring, right? And Romesh Kadlec has played all his games on it this year, and is currently #2 in runs in our league despite that? Yet the only person who even thought he should be a contender for the past month was me, I think :-)

    Absolutely!

    Romesh's numbers are far more impressive than most other batsman in the league. And I did mention in one of the previous threads that Romesh, Imran, Pradeep and Suresh were more deserving to make it to the squad than some other players.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Rup is of Indian origin. And so am I.What about racism...was the question earlier.

    I got all the answers for you,based on my last years experience.

    Nokhram

    ReplyDelete
  49. ===========================
    Self promoting nut case you are!!!
    ===============================
    And doing a hell of a job. I am everywhere and you are not.


    Adnan Baig
    United Cricket Club

    ReplyDelete
  50. Dr. B..i can't believe there is racism still..can you shed some light on your past experience...Dr..Booo..

    ReplyDelete
  51. Addi said,
    I am everywhere and you are not.
    -----------------------------
    Yeah, right!!!
    You mean everwhere you are not supposed to be.
    Only a sick person will own up to you standards (wait do you have any) and you are supposed to be ruinning for our president??

    ReplyDelete
  52. ~~~~~~~
    ideal situation addi would have spoke to TA and asked for list of players considered.
    ~~~~~~~
    Mehul did contact Tariq and asked for the list. Never got a reply.
    ~~~~~~~

    look like addy 1-step ahead veti.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Unrelated to the forum, but what the heck ...

    http://www.new7wonders.com/index.php

    Vote to keep Taj among the new 7 wonders of the world



    BTW, good to see Bola & Madhu on the roster ...

    ReplyDelete
  54. time, i take back what i said if mehul tried contact TA.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Mr. mw
    No need to share. You know it all,I can tell,since you know me so well.

    Signing off. Have a nice 2007 journey.

    ReplyDelete
  56. And Sadiq,
    even though Satha plays on a 'batter friendly' surface, he's still a stand out performer. Similarly, Asif is a stand out performer, even though he plays most of games on a spinner friendly track.

    Can't say the same about Amit. No doubt he's a good cricketer, but as I mentioned, there were others who should have been selected ahead of him. He was given preference only because Sohail was the selector.

    This is what you said earlier: First of all, let me agree about Imran - I would have definitely had him in my side to LA, one of the first people there IMHO

    If you agree that Imran should be on the squad, then which batsman would you drop in his place? The only 'weak link' on the batting end seems to be Amit. So before you around writing essays as to why we shouldn't criticize Amit's selection, maybe you should put forth the candidate who you think should be dropped. Otherwise, don't go around claiming that you would have had Imran on your side going to LA, cos we aren't flying 50 players there.

    How many bandwagons are you going to keep jumping on and off of everyday?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Dr. B..that is not a nice way to leave without telling everyone what happened with you. Dr. Boooo....

    ReplyDelete
  58. I agree with most of the suggestions made by our esteemed bloggers regarding the team.

    All the players that are selected are from DIV 1 except Bola and Madew..is this not baised.

    Suresh Paul is a good bat so is Hari from QC Kings. Both have been in top 15 last year as well this year.

    Guys who played against them can comment more.

    Perrin Doinke from Evanston is a good bowler.

    Unless u have a process in place how will anyone know how team is selected.

    Play DIV I you have more chances :))

    Just my 2 cents...

    If some one is performing consitently he should be given an oppurtunity.

    If you are playing down the order it your problem....numbers should talk as well past performancing need to be considered.

    Dr.B any comments on your old team aka.. QC Kings and its players is greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  59. let the team go to la whats done is done ppl u have the vote for next election, use it. does anyone know when these rescheduled matches will b played pak v muslim flames v rp and pak v chall night? and what happened to the mini wc or allstar game? c8w u know anythin abt them?

    ReplyDelete
  60. deccan, wk imran tailor also div 2.

    ReplyDelete
  61. time imran taylor is div 1 this season ;)

    ReplyDelete
  62. sorry.........i saw sadiq worte lucky ix so i assume dv 2.......

    ReplyDelete
  63. --------
    time said...
    sorry.........i saw sadiq worte lucky ix so i assume dv 2.......
    ------

    Actually I just cut-n-pasted from the official squad listing, and didnt bother to change anything (didnt realize till after posting that Imran had been listed under Lucky). Imran used to be with Lucky 2 years ago, but has been playing with AAA last year and this year, and so is now in Div1. He was first picked when a member of Lucky, and probably when the squad has been adjusted since every year and he's been there, his "team" hasnt been adjusted by oversight. (This was pointed out to me via email by AAA as well... but, as I told them, I just cut-n-pasted for the blog article, I cant change anything on the official website).

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  64. c8w who will u pick as la wkt keeper?

    ReplyDelete
  65. Why whats wrong with Imran? He's young and fit.

    There are other good wicketkeepers too. Mahesh, Aaron, Sharath etc.

    Sadiq will take all of them to LA.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Opps, sorry, I meant Colin not Aaron. Although Aaron is a decent player himself. I saw him keep once in practice, he did a pretty decent job IMHO. I will take him to LA too.

    ReplyDelete
  67. --------
    Deccan said...

    All the players that are selected are from DIV 1 except Bola and Madew..is this not baised.
    -------

    BTW, Ajay Gandhi from IIT was also asked (presumably as a keeper-batsman), but it seems he begged off. That could have been a third Div2 player.

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  68. ~~~~~~~
    time, i take back what i said if mehul tried contact TA.
    ~~~~~~~

    ajit its ok buddy........ chill out maan... :)) ... btw why u not go to la???????

    ReplyDelete
  69. Nice Team Selection, Guys all teams are paying for to go to LA Open, Why can't we have fair selection. I think it is litle by little getting out of control. This is my suggestion, when was the selection process, how many people have or had involve to pick the Dream Team? Base upon what criteria each player was picked?

    ReplyDelete
  70. ------------
    Tango said...
    Why whats wrong with Imran? He's young and fit.
    There are other good wicketkeepers too. Mahesh, Aaron, Sharath etc.
    Sadiq will take all of them to LA.
    --------

    If I could, sure I would :-) Id even take you to provide running commentary if I could, Tango (and Romeen, so he could lose bets and buy everyone drinks ;-)

    Seriously, FWIW, Ive said for a long time now that IMHO Mahesh is the best bat/keeper that we have, for 20/20 type games especially (well, ok, long time = this year; before that I always picked Todd as the best keeper/bat in the league, but he isnt playing in our league anymore). So, if it came down to the crunch, that would probably be my personal pick :-)

    Beyond that...I think one of the better bat/keepers in the league is actually Ashwin from Purdue (who almost nobody has mentioned, of course :-) Then there's Sharath from MUCC, Imran from AAA etc. This is all if youre going to go with the younger guys for fitness, future exposure etc too... if age is irrelevant then there is someone like Anand of Royals, who is a good gloveman and an excellent strokeplayer (even though IMHO he has never done justice to his ability in our league - his highest score might well have been the brilliant 44 or so he made when I umpired Royals a couple weeks ago).

    There is also a suggestion, of course, that Satha and Sohail both keep, and could do the job for 20 overs in a pinch, and then that would leave room for a fulltime batsman or bowler in the squad. I dont agree with that idea myself, but Ive heard it suggested a few times.

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  71. Who is this Guess guy?
    I think he is stupid or just doesn't like challengers, other wise he will not give this senseless statement regarding challenger'sability. I like Pak and Challengers both as a warriors, you can not say until last delivery. I think guess is just stupid as regular comentatior, just wanted to give statement to stay in lime light, It will be the best fight until last ball for this GAME.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Cricketwallah, U are the best keeper if youcan keep pressure on batsman, this is mind game rather than physical, Ashwin is good keeper too, but don't forget that Mahesh has an edge of every keeper due to the level of cricket he has played. Nothing against your openion, but this info is also handy, and good commentator always have all info ready prior to give any comments.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Adnan you don't have any right to say anything against Executives, suddenly you start seeing many deffects in every move, when were you before? just because you lost bid to president, you don't like anything that midwest does.
    So just keep your mouth shut and see what is going on.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Nice team .......our hard earned money goes to drain again.There are quite a few players who should not be selected why i give some small reason.
    1.Raheel why on the basis of the last over he bowled in the night game against challengers 25 runs with 3 no balls & couple of wides this kid always struggles with his line & lenght.
    2.Amit why because i think he still have to prove more last year he made some runs because ppl don't know about him if he is good he has to be consistent for atleast 3 to 4 years he got selected because he is playing for st.louis right now he is just a average player thats about it.
    3.Nasir mahmood why what does this guy do Ooh my bad he plays for Flamed i rest my case.
    4.Daxx why i think he is good but he lack a lot of pace not to mention he goes for 13 runs in the first over against pak in the night game i personally thinks he will go for lot of runs in L.A.
    5.Imran Taylor why because there are lot of good wk/batsmen in this league such as mahesh parikh. If he got selected because he is young then i think sohail should not be there because he is around 40-41.I dont understand the criteria young and fit players or 40 yrs old VP both selection oppose each other.
    5.Maninder bola why because he play only 6 games in our league & you guys think he is selection worthy no way if satha have to prove then maninder is not somebody special.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Bingo Justice 4 all,
    Atleast some one with me. I think management should hav some kind of exclamanation for this, Tehsin Ahmed is showing personal reason, I don't think that is the reason, he definately wants to go, but than there will be more descripency will occur so they pick Amitkumar, If Raheel, Nasir, Maninder god know who else. I thinkd midwest sending all these guys to make records. Can Someone Tell who picks this team? God Save Midwest from Evil Selection Committee

    ReplyDelete
  76. Guys,
    All this guys you are talking about as pure batsmen, and nobody has even mentioned DARSHAN once is really surprising, he's been putting up numbers for a while now and this year he's in blistering form.
    That's just my take and i'm not trying to be biased because he's my teammate.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Tushar,
    Darshan definitely is right up there with most of these batsmen, at least the way he has been playing this season. Nobody else has a better seat than me watching him play.

    Especially the knock against Pak in the night game, he played a solid 74 without a single chance.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Fellas,
    No, it wasn't a strategic blog meeting by Challengers to boost Darshan's chances..... :-)

    Like everybody else feels about Imran being left out, I definitely think Darshan missed out this ride...

    ReplyDelete
  79. Shekhs, Tushar,

    Fair comments, and to be honest, a lot of people have overlooked him. Someone who's a good 1-day player may not be ideal for 20/20. Similarly, a good 20/20 player may not do well in 1-day games. Darshan does deserve a look into the team, or at least the probables. I'm sure there is some logic behind how the team was picked, but unfortunately no transparency.

    Hope to see you guys on Tuesday for the night game.

    ReplyDelete
  80. If I could, sure I would :-) Id even take you to provide running commentary if I could, Tango (and Romeen, so he could lose bets and buy everyone drinks ;-)

    c8w, Who said you're old fashioned? You know what's going on these days!! You just need to help Romeen get on the same page!! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  81. ------------
    Tango said...
    And Sadiq,
    even though Satha plays on a 'batter friendly' surface, he's still a stand out performer.

    Can't say the same about Amit. No doubt he's a good cricketer, but as I mentioned, there were others who should have been selected ahead of him. He was given preference only because Sohail was the selector.
    .....
    would you drop in his place? The only 'weak link' on the batting end seems to be Amit.
    --------

    OK, finally the stats are back up (I couldnt access the stat pages all day!), so I can respond to this one with some numbers :-)

    Now, Ive seen Amit play only like once or twice, so I dont have *that* much to go on except actual performances. But I presume thats the case with you too, Tango, and also with the rest of the league (even not knowing who you are... unless youre on the St Louis team or an umpire in St Louis, youve only seen Amit a maximum of twice I presume, as a player :-)

    The following are the numbers, the results of his actual performance in our league. Last season, he played 10 games, 2 not outs, 386 runs at 48.25 with 1 century (he was effectively 2nd in batting averages behind only Bhavneet). This season he is currently 7th in runs for the year, 8 matches, 219 runs at 43.8. In other words he has been consistently good in our league so far, 40+ averages both seasons... last year, only 5 batsmen in the entire league averaged over 40 while scoring over 300 runs, Amit included, BTW.

    Yes, I think Imran should have been on the team - he would have been one of the first names I picked, on weight of runs as well as how quickly he makes them (thus its an easy statement for me; Imran, to me, was not a particularly marginal choice - for marginal choices Id have to think about things, look at numbers to refresh memory etc, not just randomly picking people). I just think Amit is a good player and is being unfairly maligned, and I said so - and I dont think Imran making it would mean Amit doesnt make it. Imran just makes it for sure in my squad, before most other batsmen IMHO, not just Amit.

    You said above that Amit was the obvious "weak link" in the side. Look at the results of last year and early this year objectively, and tell me you still think thats true? Note again, Amit made 386 runs at 48 last year - how does that *ever* become a weak link in any side?

    Imran, Shahid and Sohail made more runs than Amit last year, but all played more matches too - Amit actually averaged more than all of them. Afroze played more matches than Amit, but made less runs at a lower average than Amit. Madhu played more matches than Amit but made less runs at a lower average, despite playing in Division Two. And yet, despite all that, its only Amit who is considered the weak link in the batting??

    You can presume Iam on whatever bandwagon you want to presume :-) I just wish people wouldnt see ulterior motives in any statements made, but take them at face value for whats actually being said. I think Amit is a very good player who has been consistently good in our league in the 2 years he played - thats borne out by the numbers he has put up. Because I thought he was being unfairly maligned, I said so. If you want to say he is the weak link in the side and there just because of politics, its your right to express your opinion... but if you want to convince me he has less right to be on the team than people whose numbers he has bettered for the past 2 years, I dont neccesarily have to agree with you, no? :-)

    (And yes, I know the bit about "playing on a friendly batting surface".. if thats true, then shouldnt St Louis' bowlers have *terrible* numbers, bowling on such a great batting surface? Tehsin, I believe, is currently #2 in wickets in our league bowling on that surface, isnt he? It cant be *that* much of a bowlers graveyard, surely? :-)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  82. In other words he has been consistently good in our league so far, 40+ averages both seasons... last year, only 5 batsmen in the entire league averaged over 40 while scoring over 300 runs, Amit included, BTW.

    As I mentioned earlier: batting friendly pitch. Over the last two seasons, he’s played six games outside St.Louis (including one playoff game) and has averaged a miserable 10.83 in all those games. Not once did he cross 35. Now what might be the reasons behind his failures? Surely, a player who has consistently averaged 40+ over two seasons, ought to have had at least one successfully innings away from home? Or will we have to move the LA Open to St.Louis, to accommodate our homesick superstar?

    You said above that Amit was the obvious "weak link" in the side.

    No, that’s not what I said, I said: The only 'weak link' on the batting end seems to be Amit.

    Imran, Shahid and Sohail made more runs than Amit last year, but all played more matches too - Amit actually averaged more than all of them.

    Sure, then please drop Sohail and Shahid from the side and see what happens. If your trying to convince me that Amit is a more deserving player than those three guys, then only God can help you.

    Afroze played more matches than Amit, but made less runs at a lower average than Amit. Madhu played more matches than Amit but made less runs at a lower average, despite playing in Division Two

    Afroze and Madhu were both selected as All-Rounders, not as specialist batsman. If Imran were to be included in the side, you’d have to drop another specialist batsman. The only specialist batsmen in our side are: Satha, Sohail, and Bola (assuming they don’t let him bowl). So we’d have to drop one of them instead. Please don’t tell me Amit is better than either of them.

    You can presume Iam on whatever bandwagon you want to presume :-) I just wish people wouldnt see ulterior motives in any statements made, but take them at face value for whats actually being said.

    My query was simple: If you think Imran should be on the team, then who would you drop? Now, I didn’t expect you to misinterpret my statements, and go on a crusade to defend your beloved warrior. The selection of Amit, although debatable, didn’t seem to be inequitable, the exclusion of Imran Syed, did.

    And yes, I know the bit about "playing on a friendly batting surface".. if thats true, then shouldnt St Louis' bowlers have *terrible* numbers, bowling on such a great batting surface? Tehsin, I believe, is currently #2 in wickets in our league bowling on that surface, isnt he? It cant be *that* much of a bowlers graveyard, surely?

    Sadiq, now your just being silly. You know quiet well that the astro-turf pitch favors spinners, but its still a lot easier to score on than concrete pitches.

    ReplyDelete
  83. There is lot of talk about Imran bhai being added to the team and rightfully so. I saw him bat last week in Washington Park and I don't think there is anyone suited better for the 20/20 format. Six huge sixes in four or five overs of batting. He is a great talent. Also, his height is an advantage on the pitches in LA.

    Aside from Imran, I'm surprised why his brother Kamran is not discussed much to be a part of this squad. Both brothers are great hitters.

    My two cents...add Imran and Kamran Syed.
    Good luck to the players selected.

    -Asmar

    ReplyDelete
  84. Wow lots of ppl standup on the issue of imran syed i just wanna ask farhat or someone from the muslim why dont they talk to the management about this issue just ask them the reason i think they do have a right to ask question.
    jaggi & aditya why don't u guys do a poll about how many ppl wanna see a selection commitee in place for L.A. Open. Thanks & keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Adi,
    We'll be there on tuesday...
    We have to come up with a plan to figure out who Tango is...he is trying to set us up...

    ReplyDelete
  86. tango je che bapu khatooo laage che bhai...buddhii and gaa*dsiri karvani, banne ni avdat che bhai..

    ReplyDelete
  87. mehul,

    english subtitiles please? even hindi ones will do!

    ReplyDelete
  88. TANGO JO BHI DIMAAG BAHOOT DIMAAG WALLA LAGTA HAI...DIMAAG KE SAATH SAATH BOTTOM MEIN UNGLI KARNE KI KHOBIYAAN BHI RAKHTA HAI...

    ReplyDelete
  89. EK AUR BAAT TO TAI HAI BHAI, KI WOH BIWI BACHHE WALA NAHI HAI. GANDU KE PASS BAHOOT TIME HAI. SAALA SADIQ KI ANALYSIS KI EK, EK LINE LEKAR M** B** KARDI.

    ReplyDelete
  90. At this stage, Tango has become such a cult hero, I'm tempted to say I'm Tango!

    ReplyDelete
  91. Shekhs, are we gonna hang out tonite?

    ReplyDelete
  92. No, I'm Tango...

    Sure Romeen..lets get out tonite..

    ReplyDelete
  93. We've started a whole "I'm spartacus" thing....

    Pick a place Shekhs. ALL bloggers and blog readers welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Romeen, Swetal was talking about some place the other nite..

    Swet, you around?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Tango main hoon, mark idhar hai.

    -Samarth.

    ReplyDelete
  96. matter of fact, I wouldn't be surprised if you were Tango..SouthPaw..

    You are a gujju...lived in the south....talked about Sivaji the other day like Tango came up with his full name..

    ReplyDelete
  97. Hari,
    Why on Earth would you list all those rules on the blog page man.. :-)

    Its a pain to scroll down to figure out the thread you wanna post..

    You think we are blogging too much ?? :-)


    Romeen,
    I was talking to my co-workers, they were suggesting a few bars in the wicker park area.
    Also, one suggested a Tapas bar called Bravo near the intersection of Division and Damon.
    I love Tapas, I dont know if anybody else is up for it..

    ReplyDelete
  98. hmmm... the plot thickens....

    ReplyDelete
  99. Bravo's good for me, any other takers?
    Tango? nw? sd? vp? time? guess? anybody?

    ReplyDelete
  100. mastakilla,
    just an update on practice, I'll know by this weekend what our slot's going to be.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Mehul,

    Don't underestimate Sadiq. I'm sure he's preparing another three page essay.

    Sadiq,

    Here's the thing. I might have sounded a little harsh in my criticism of Amit in the last post. But thats only because you pissed me off.

    I think he's a good batsman, one of the best in our league. But we simply don't have a spot on the side for him. Take the Amol Muzumdar example for instance. He too is a star batsman, but his role (as a middle order batsman) has been filled up by others, like Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman, who are irreplaceable (or were irreplaceable).

    Similarly, Amit can't replace Sohail, Bola, Satha, or Imran on our side. Hence, he shouldn't be on the team to LA.

    ReplyDelete
  102. So now I'm Samarth?

    Thats much better than being called Shetul.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Tango man,
    what happened to you?
    running a temperature or something?

    You are talking hifi langg now...

    ReplyDelete
  104. Tango, are you up for tonite's party?

    ReplyDelete
  105. Romeen,

    No way man! I'm pretty sure there must be a bounty on my head by now.

    Maybe some other time.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Whoa, Shekhs. I was just making a joke. I've got less time, and fewer opinions, than Tango.

    -Samarth.

    ReplyDelete
  107. Samarth,

    You did log in as brainsinballs, didn't you?

    ReplyDelete
  108. Sorry Samarth...evidently...you are not Tango.. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  109. that was faiz...i am pretty sure, though he denies, like romeen thinks i am AHQ...

    ReplyDelete
  110. Spartacus now!
    This is hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
  111. =====
    So now I'm Samarth?

    Thats much better than being called Shetul.
    =====

    Why do you think so? I wouldn't mind being called Shetul myself.

    -Samarth.

    ReplyDelete
  112. It gets better and better in here...

    Who's next - The Gladiator?

    ReplyDelete
  113. Well Shetul is not playing in the LA Open.

    ReplyDelete
  114. mehulshani said...

    that was faiz...i am pretty sure, though he denies, like romeen thinks i am AHQ.


    Damn! Not Faisal....anyone but Faisal.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I'd say brains/balls-whatever had some pretty strong opinions, and wrote rather long posts. As I said, I have little time and very few opinions to offer. This year, anyway.

    I am proud of one opinion though. :-) I was probably the first one to mention an "all-star" game on this blog, in May last year. Seems like it has generated lot of discussion since.

    -Samarth.

    ReplyDelete
  116. ====
    Well Shetul is not playing in the LA Open.
    ====

    Look at all the rosters. Maybe in a week's time, I will wish I didn't either.

    -Samarth.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Romeen,
    Where is your party tonight?

    ReplyDelete
  118. Shekhs,

    I know this doesn't belong here (forgive me c8w and don't raise the finger of death against us), but any update on the completion of the Pak Gym V Challengers 20/20 game? Can you keep us posted, coz i'd like to watch the final quarter if possible.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Adi,
    We haven't heard anything about that game yet..

    Will keep you guys posted..

    ReplyDelete
  120. I AM NOT TANGO. Sorry, but that's already done the round, and I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate this! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  121. Look at all the rosters. Maybe in a week's time, I will wish I didn't either.

    -Samarth.


    No worries, by then I'll be someone else.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Adi, I didnt think you were Tango, you come up with lame predictions :)

    ReplyDelete
  123. ice_cold,
    I think we are thinking Bravo's in wicker park.

    ReplyDelete
  124. ro, or sheks
    what was sheks log in lastyear?

    ReplyDelete
  125. come now... we are all friends here.

    ReplyDelete
  126. cmc, do you write under some other nick too?

    ReplyDelete
  127. how 'bout u ro.
    did you use a nick?

    ReplyDelete
  128. no N_W today??
    tango without cash?
    btw tang u make a lot of good points agianst the opinionator(c8w) you certainly came back with a good rebut. this rounds goes to you. sorry sadi your efforts to boost yet another of your boys has fallen short wiht your arguments. imran should definitely replace amit. no doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  129. i propsoe a ballot for the all stars. jaggi, hari please put up a ballot to vote for people to play in the allstar game(virtual) cause this will never take place.

    ReplyDelete
  130. Guys,
    Don't go after Identity, Look how great job he is doing, go for it,

    I'm Tango, Romeen, Sharath, Adi, Shekhs,
    Guys try to make big of deal, this is only way we can reach to Selection (If their is one) panel.

    ReplyDelete
  131. Mehul, U are bystandard person, when it comes against Midwest you want to go with big mouth, and when it comes against Adnan you want to protect him, why is that?

    ReplyDelete
  132. since the allstar game is entertainment only. we should follow suit of, nfl, nba, mlb.
    give the people what or who they want to see. we want imran to represent mwcc in laopen. who else wants to see this?

    ReplyDelete
  133. Tango,
    You are doing great job, why don't you and Rup run for President and vice president?

    ReplyDelete
  134. -----------
    Tango said...
    Sadiq,
    Here's the thing. I might have sounded a little harsh in my criticism of Amit in the last post. But thats only because you pissed me off.
    I think he's a good batsman, one of the best in our league. But we simply don't have a spot on the side for him. Take the Amol Muzumdar example for instance. He too is a star batsman, but his role (as a middle order batsman) has been filled up by others, like Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman, who are irreplaceable (or were irreplaceable).
    Similarly, Amit can't replace Sohail, Bola, Satha, or Imran on our side. Hence, he shouldn't be on the team to LA.
    ---------

    What khali-pili getting pissed off because of internet cricket discussion, yaar? :-) If I had gotten pissed off every time someone disagreed with me (or even flamed me) because of an internet cricket thread, Id have serious ulcers by now :-) Nothing should ever be pissing-off-worthy here (or on google-groups).

    If you think Amit is a very good batsman, one of the best in our league, there isnt much to argue, really.. cos thats about where Iam at in my opinions too. Was he a *certain* pick for LA (like Satha, Shahid, Asif, Nilesh etc)? I didnt think so, before the selection, but he was surely someone who was up very high among the contenders, and his final selection isnt IMHO a bad one at all.

    I dont disagree with your Amol example in some ways, but I do in other ways - a terrific batsman, and he *should* have played for India. Remember, you can say our middleorder was filled up etc, which is all very true... but we've also had Kaif, Jadeja, Badani etc all actually play middle-order test match cricket for India in the past decade. If your best backup batsman had actually been always in the running, maybe that wouldnt have happened, you wouldnt have had true unworthies like Kaif batting for India in test matches. But dont get me started on Amol, you already know thats a bad idea :-)

    I dont agree with your analysis of "competitors for Amits spot", BTW. Bola is 2nd in Division Two in wickets at the moment, despite not playing all the games... why is he not an allrounder (you suggested he wouldnt be allowed to bowl, Iam not sure why)? If you look at it that way, pretty much everyone in the side bowls sometime or the other. How many bowlers do you really need? Neither Afroze nor Madhu were in the Top Fifteen in bowlers last year or this year in either division... why dont you want to consider them primarily as batsmen who do some bowling? Just like everyone else, theyre in the running for spots along with Amit and the rest IMHO.

    I think when youre picking this side, youre picking people like Shahid, Nilesh, Asif etc as certainties - and they are all allrounders too, and your best bowlers. Then youve taken 2/3 specialist pacemen too (Nasir, Raheel), plus people like Daxx and Bola (allrounders). You get to that stage, surely with the rest bowling isnt that *huge* a consideration anymore? For *all* the other players I think the batting ability is the most important... and in that I think the numbers Amit has put up compare with anyone else on the team.

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  135. bond
    how come you don't take shots at mehul? is it a fellow gujju thing?
    afterall you say he protects big mouth.

    ReplyDelete
  136. I Think These should be on Executive Body
    Tango -------> President
    Rup ---------> Vice Prsident
    Adi ---------> Secretary
    Romeen ------> Public Relation
    Tushar, Sharath, Shekhs as a Advisor
    Jaggi -------> Marketing

    ReplyDelete
  137. By the way I'm neither Gujju nor protection Mehul.
    I just wanted to to let myopenion regarding Mehul, When it comes to Adnan he is always in defensive mode.
    Where did you see I'm protection Mehul.

    ReplyDelete
  138. sadiq is there a spot for imran on the team? and why does amit deserve it more then him? if you had to pick one(i know you won't) because you never go out on a limb. who would you pick. not that your opinion matters...i don't know you can keep justifying a spot for amit and deny one for imran. who has proven himself over and over. it is biased view like yours that keep good cricketers down. just because you back someone does not mean they are up to those standards.

    ReplyDelete
  139. I never like mehul as a player, he is always crying baby on the field, always have someknid of excuse in favor of him, always

    ReplyDelete
  140. How about Darshan?
    He is playing best cricket of him in regular game as well as in 30/30.
    He should be more deserving than most batsman.

    ReplyDelete
  141. bond if he agrees with adnan on everything why do u take shots at adnan only? this is called hypocracy. why so civil to mehul and asking him questions cordially but name calling when it come to the other.

    ReplyDelete
  142. now you really sound dumb. bond!
    bond, dumb bond.

    ReplyDelete
  143. cro_magna_crawling said...

    Heybuddy, it always like that, if selectors have soft side towards you, you are in,very simple.

    If you look at Team India,
    Ahjit Agarkar: When ever there is big tournament,he is in, how, nobody knows, but he plays or gets selected.

    ReplyDelete
  144. so let's come out and say it. sadi, did you help select the team?

    ReplyDelete
  145. I'm not taking shot at adnan, I'm just expressing my openion, that's howI feel, you don't need to take personally.
    By the way Myname is Bond, Dumb or not,but myname is Bond, Just Bond

    ReplyDelete
  146. sadiq
    when was the last time you called someone for chucking in the league?
    and where did you get your notes on lbw?

    ReplyDelete
  147. ----------
    cro_magna_crawling said...
    btw tang u make a lot of good points agianst the opinionator(c8w) you certainly came back with a good rebut. this rounds goes to you. sorry sadi your efforts to boost yet another of your boys has fallen short wiht your arguments. imran should definitely replace amit. no doubt.
    --------

    Opinionator! I like that! I think I shall adopt it as my new nickname :-)

    BTW, whatever you think of my arguments is ok... but please, dont call him "my boy" :-) I dont know the guy from Adam, Ive met him like once in my life I think, if I passed him on the road tomorrow I probably wouldnt recognize him :-) I know *all* the other guys on the squad much better than I know him, have seen them more and for longer while playing etc. I just felt he was being unfairly maligned as a bad selection for no good reason (partly because of the team he plays for), and disagreed with it, is all :-)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  148. nothing personal bond. just a bad attempt at a joke on my part.
    my apologies. sir.

    ReplyDelete
  149. so sadiq
    would you support replacing amit with imran? don't go out on a limb now.

    ReplyDelete
  150. --------
    cro_magna_crawling said...
    sadiq is there a spot for imran on the team? and why does amit deserve it more then him?
    -------

    You werent around yesterday, were you? The first thing I ever said was that Imran would have definitely been on my team - he wouldnt even be a fringe-candidate for me, hed be a certainty. I think you cant ignore performances in the league... the guy was the #1 rungetter in the entire league, I would have had him in as one of my first picks. What Ive said repeatedly (apparently to no avail) is I dont think its only Imran *or* Amit, in my opinion.

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  151. so in a limited capacity (the number of players going) imran should replace amit? afterall we want our best to go. what is even more appaling is his name is not even on the list of players contacted. that tell me you guys have an ulterior motive. according to your own judgements he is the #1 getter all last year and you guys don't even ask him if he wants to go. that is very disappapointing.

    ReplyDelete
  152. i am not asking as one of your picks, i am asking as the pick. he should be a definite just like shahid asif...not even being asked, what is the reason for that?

    ReplyDelete
  153. cro_magna_crawling
    Thanks forhumble comunication.

    My only intention is to improve league, even if we all have to be bad guys.
    Guys Keep Fighting until Justice is Served.

    ReplyDelete
  154. cmc,
    I was Desi_babu last year...will that answer your question..?

    Romeen,
    You are off the oath of secrecy... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  155. Shekhs, That was last year, how abt this year?

    ReplyDelete
  156. if the league meaning the teams are footing the bill for la open tickets we have all the right to voiceferously express our opinions.
    people like the opinionator want to keep on defending management no matter what they do. c8w grow a pair and don't justify the unjust. imran got a raw deal, regardless of you strattling the fence.

    ReplyDelete
  157. -----------
    Tango said...
    As I mentioned earlier: batting friendly pitch.
    .....
    Sadiq, now your just being silly. You know quiet well that the astro-turf pitch favors spinners, but its still a lot easier to score on than concrete pitches.
    ---------

    BTW, scores in St Louis this season are as follows:

    AAA 53 allout
    Rogers Park 135 allout
    Challengers 164 allout
    Pak Gym 96 allout
    United 223 allout (chasing 236)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  158. That is perfect, cro_magna_crawling, but as a player you don't hav any right to speak, that right only team Captian or Representative has. so as aindividual I ro you speaks, we will be denied to give any answer.

    ReplyDelete
  159. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  160. sheks it all makes sense now.

    ReplyDelete
  161. Hey Romeen,
    I've never seen you taking shot at Officials? Is it some knda a deal or something? Just want to raise eye browse!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  162. once again esoteric information c8w.
    you are not keeping into account all of these teams had to drive 5+ hrs.
    st. louis 137 allout
    st. louis 167
    both losses and on the road. point is you have no point.

    ReplyDelete
  163. ---------
    cro_magna_crawling said...
    so let's come out and say it. sadi, did you help select the team?
    --------

    CMC, you can say whatever you want about my umpiring or my opinions, its ok.... but please, sir, dont accuse me of selecting the team! Not that! Anything but that! :-)

    Iam just an umpire, is all - I dont select anything, I dont help in selecting anything. Iam perfectly willing to offer my own personal views about anything on the blog, but thats as far as it goes.

    Once again - just so its clear to everyone. Please... I DID NOT select the team :-) If I had selected it, it would probably be a whole lot different.. but we all have our own views, and are entitled to them. (And yes, as I said above, Imran would have been on a team I would have selected... Amit may have been too, however :-)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  164. c8w,
    you just can't bring yourself to take a stance. very diapointng, indeed.
    last question then i am done picking on you,(you have been a good sport) did imran get a raw deal?

    ReplyDelete
  165. Hey CMC now you're trying to cut deal on side? Come on mon Stand up for every fair player who is not in the roster.

    ReplyDelete
  166. sorry bond
    but darshan is having a good year and obviously in good form. he should go, but still feel imran got a far worse deal! the man lead the league in runs and no one even contacts him.

    ReplyDelete
  167. "I never like mehul as a player, he is always crying baby on the field, always have someknid of excuse in favor of him, always"

    Thanks bond. Keep it coming.

    ReplyDelete
  168. Bond,
    This year I'm Tango..

    cmc,
    What makes sense out of me being D_B last year?

    ReplyDelete
  169. CMC I'm not in favor of Darshan, but officials never look at him for LAOpen at all,that's pathatic and tells how favoritism goes with someone else's money, Is it clear buddy?

    ReplyDelete
  170. Shekhs Tango can't be you definetaly, I bet you whole botle on that? anyone agree or supporter?

    ReplyDelete
  171. I doubt on Adi, since him, tango and Sadi are the only in blog that goes with full description of any matter.

    ReplyDelete
  172. bondbhai tu gujju..j che..tango, romeen shu keh che?

    ReplyDelete
  173. By the way Mehul you are great human being, OK, nothing personal, and good luck for LAOpen.

    ReplyDelete
  174. Please Mehul, don't call me bhai I'm mush younger that all of you,
    I'm learning from the best. I always come to ground and try to learn. that's it.

    ReplyDelete
  175. bond you are really funny...thanks anyway. I will need all good wishes to come out below 10 runs per over.

    ReplyDelete
  176. ---------
    cro_magna_crawling said...
    c8w,
    you just can't bring yourself to take a stance. very diapointng, indeed.
    last question then i am done picking on you,(you have been a good sport) did imran get a raw deal?
    -------

    Geez, CMC, Ive been saying Imran got a raw deal in my opinion since yesterday afternoon! Doesnt anybody read anything? :-)

    As for not taking a stance... that *is* a stance, just not one everyone seems to like, but thats ok with me :-) But in this instance I'll agree with Adnan... its amusing to be accused of cowardice by someone who has never put forth any opinion under his own actual name :-)

    c8w

    ReplyDelete
  177. See guys, what ever goes on blog it is just for entertain purpose, no body should take personally.

    ReplyDelete
  178. Kem cho Bond Bhai..

    Teekhi bhakiri khaye che..?

    ReplyDelete
  179. What is that, I don't get the last part, ShekhsBhai

    ReplyDelete
  180. Shekhs,
    Please stop posting in gujarati,
    your bhakiri sounds more like bhikhari.
    Bonds he meant
    "teekhi bhakhri khavi che?"
    Shekhs atleast get a year under your belt and then you can start talking in gujarati.

    ReplyDelete
  181. Looks like everybody is on Lunch, so quite, Shekhs

    ReplyDelete
  182. Thanks Tushar, but Can you please translate in Eng or atleast Hindi?

    ReplyDelete
  183. Aint you supposed be selling some stones....rather than giving me Gujarati lessons?

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  184. tushar, aa bond non-gujju hovano pryatna kare che, pun boss it is very hard to hide gujju blood.

    ReplyDelete
  185. Bhaiya Mehul, kyon sub ke pichhe pade huve ho, Naam janke baad bahut hi taklif hoti hai, baba aisan anko karne ka.

    ReplyDelete
  186. Holy shi#$@@#! You guys been busy.

    Romes/Shekhs: The place I was talking about is Rivers (Madison and Wacker)...it faces the canal...live music......I can't come out and play tonite guys. Need to leave for an away game at Madison at 6:30 in the morning (10 AM start time).

    And I know my limitations...me a weak person as in if I come up for a few drinks, I ain't getting home till 3 AM ! And me be 2 old to be playing like dat and then wanting to play cricket da next day!

    Sorry guys. Next time....Next weekend actually....we got no games !

    ReplyDelete
  187. Shwetal,
    Stop making excuses, you F***.
    Shekhs,
    I looked at the blog and your gujarati and couldn't resist.
    I'm out though.
    See y'll later.

    ReplyDelete
  188. Swetal,
    No sweat man..
    There is always a next time.. :-)
    If we get some more folks then we will still hang tonite, else we will reschedule...

    Good Luck with your game tomorrow..

    ReplyDelete
  189. Neither Afroze nor Madhu were in the Top Fifteen in bowlers last year or this year in either division... why dont you want to consider them primarily as batsmen who do some bowling?

    Just so I make myself clear once again: I don’t think Afroze should have been in the team. Selecting him as an All-Rounder is a far bigger travesty than Amit being selected as a specialist batsman. But, he is the only other half-decent spinner in the side (assuming Bola doesn’t bowl spin; and no, I don’t consider Satha and Sohail to be spinners). Therefore, replacing him with Imran makes little sense. I would have taken Pradeep in his place; he’s a much better fit, since he’s a lot harder to hit than Afroze, and he’s a pretty handy batsman too, although his batting style is best suited for the longer version of the game.

    Now, I wouldn’t mind Imran being selected ahead of Madhu. But Madhu, unlike Pradeep, is an excellent 20-20 batsman. So I’d probably take him ahead of Amit. If it were a 50 over game, then I’d pick Amit over Madhu in a heartbeat. Madhu is also a handy bowler, and considering the past achievements of our opening bowlers, or lack there off, I’d be a lot happier having Madhu on my side.

    Just by glancing over the names in the squad, it looks as though our batting is extremely strong, while our bowling is extremely weak!
    We only have two reliable bowlers in the side, Nilesh and Asif. Shahid and Daxx are far too inconsistent, and the rest of the bowlers…..well, I don’t want to beat up on them even more, so lets just leave it at ‘not good enough’. Having a lot of backups is a necessity.

    Our batting on the other is loaded. Just look at the names - Bola, Sohail, Satha, Shahid, Amit, Asif, Afroze, Nilesh, Daxx, Whew!
    Hence, if we are to include another specialist batsman like Imran, Amit’s the guy who will have to make way, since he’s the weakest of the all the specialist batsman in the team. (And ‘weak’ is a relative term. So don’t get on my ass again.)

    But dont get me started on Amol, you already know thats a bad idea :-)

    No, I won’t argue with you about Amol Muzumdar. I already read the article you posted on him on cricinfo ;-)
    Just want to say that Amol had a solid start to his career. In his first eight years he averaged something like 75, but back then he was competing against guys like Dravid, Manjrekar, Laxman, Azhar, Kambli, Ganguly and Tendulkar IIRC. His best chance of making the team came after 2000; unfortunately he went into a batting slump then. Consequently, guys like Badani, Kaif, Yuvraj were selected, and poor Muzumdar was left out despite regaining form a few years later.
    But anyways, I agree, he should have gotten at least one chance. Poor guy! Kinda reminds me of Imran now ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  190. Shekhs u calling Sweetman is this some kind of TYPO I guess, it is personally, sorry Shekhs.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Tango said
    "Just by glancing over the names in the squad, it looks as though our batting is extremely strong, while our bowling is extremely weak!"

    Well, you are playing 20/20...so you might as well stock your batsmen rather than bowlers..
    No matter who bowls, they are gonna score...it was never a bowler's game..

    ReplyDelete
  192. Bond,
    Do I need to give you some lessons in English now...??

    I thought you were a "BOND"...

    ReplyDelete